### Logic and Arguments

I just wanted to give a quick primer on logic and arguments:

Generally, an argument is

Any argument that follows these rules is considered

Example of

1. If it is raining outside, then the streets are wet. (P--> Q)

2. It is raining outside. (P)

3. Therefore, the streets are wet. (Q)

This is a valid argument. The following is also valid:

1. If the moon is made of green cheese, then I am the president. (P--> Q)

2. The moon is made of green cheese. (P)

3. Therefore, I am the president. (Q)

While clearly false, this is a valid argument because it follows the rules of logic.

If an argument is valid and its premises are

So, if someone claims that a particular argument is fallacious or illogical, he must show how it violates the rules and laws of logic, OR he must show that one of its premises is false. For instance, the second argument above is valid, but someone could defeat it simply by showing that the moon is not, in fact, made of green cheese. If premise (2) is false, then the argument is unsound.

Generally, an argument is

*logical*if it follows the laws of logic, which typically take standard forms: modus ponens, modus tollens, dysjunctive syllogism, etc.Any argument that follows these rules is considered

*valid*. If it violates these forms, it is*invalid.*Example of

*modus ponens*:1. If it is raining outside, then the streets are wet. (P--> Q)

2. It is raining outside. (P)

3. Therefore, the streets are wet. (Q)

This is a valid argument. The following is also valid:

1. If the moon is made of green cheese, then I am the president. (P--> Q)

2. The moon is made of green cheese. (P)

3. Therefore, I am the president. (Q)

While clearly false, this is a valid argument because it follows the rules of logic.

If an argument is valid and its premises are

*true*, then the argument is*sound.*The first argument is sound (assuming it*is*raining outside), while the second is unsound.So, if someone claims that a particular argument is fallacious or illogical, he must show how it violates the rules and laws of logic, OR he must show that one of its premises is false. For instance, the second argument above is valid, but someone could defeat it simply by showing that the moon is not, in fact, made of green cheese. If premise (2) is false, then the argument is unsound.

## 3 Comments:

Faith is spiritualized imagination.

Henry Ward Beecher- Posters.

chris, I was just passing by on my search for things about Church on

the Net, and dropped in on your blog. I was looking for stuff for my Church site. Not

sure that your blog was exactly what I needed, but I enjoyed my visit all the same.

good point. thanks

Post a Comment

<< Home